Since my first posts on this topic in January, the Euro zone situation has gone from bad to worse.
Economic conditions in almost all of the member countries have deteriorated, even after massive bailouts and 'strengthening' measures.
Heads of state from around the globe seem to be meeting on an almost daily basis to discuss the best course of action, but very little has been done to rectify the problems faced.
As I hinted previously, the only way i see out of this is either -
a) Let
Or
b) Make huge inroads towards greater fiscal integration within the Euro zone.
The rhetoric we are hearing from Angela Merkel (Chancellor of Germany) and her peers suggests that they are well aware of this choice.
It seems that they think that choice a) (letting countries fall out of the single currency) would be so cataclysmic that it simply can't be allowed to happen.
Therefore they seem to agree that choice b) is the way to go.
This however is much easier said than done. The kind of integration needed to make this work would basically involve a huge redistribution of wealth from the richer countries (namely
Why should the people of
My personal opinion is that the weaker countries should be left to go bankrupt.
It would be very messy in the short run, but in the long run everyone would be better off.
Greece etc would return to their old currencies, which would substantially devalue and allow them once again to compete in the international marketplace.
Further fiscal integration would still be needed between the remaining countries but this decision would hopefully be an easier one to make as it would be more in everyone’s best interest.
A bit of history...
The precursor to the Euro was the ERM (Exchange Rate Mechanism), it was formed in 1979 and worked by pegging members currencies to each other to reduce exchange rate volatility.
The
The
It will be far more complicated for
No comments:
Post a Comment